User identification and the monitoring of financial activity on the platform are set by the pairing of the AML and KYC regulatory requirements: the first brings together the procedures for detecting and blocking the movement of illicit funds through the system, while the second is responsible for establishing identity and confirming that an account belongs to a specific owner.
Transaction Monitoring Standards
The platform detects suspicious patterns before they escalate into a breach of the rules — a task handled by the continuous, automated review of deposits and withdrawals. Because the platform runs on cryptocurrency, every movement of funds passes through the blockchain with network confirmations and is recorded permanently.
Core elements of monitoring:
- Transactions pass through the blockchain with network confirmations
- Real-time reading of activity under risk-control rules
- Withdrawal confirmation by email or via 2FA
- Manual review of large and high-risk withdrawals
- A limit of USD 100,000 per single withdrawal
Settlement via the blockchain ensures immutability and traceability: once confirmed, a transaction’s hash remains a record that can be referred back to. The standards described above complement risk thresholds rather than replacing the No-KYC model.
Customer Verification Procedures
Cybet resorts to establishing a player’s identity only when account behavior or legal requirements call for it — and that is precisely what the KYC procedure consists of. Registration requires nothing more than a personal email address, so most participants gain access to the games without a single document.
Triggers and steps of verification:
- Atypical login: a series of failed attempts or an unfamiliar device
- Suspicion of fraud and profiles flagged during AML review
- Withdrawals above the established thresholds
- A request for identity documents by email, matching the registration details
- The hash of the most recent deposit as proof of control over the wallet
- Age confirmation to screen out minors
Email confirmation and 2FA support, including authenticators such as Google Authenticator, provide an additional check at the login and withdrawal stages. Identification remains the exception rather than the rule: KYC is engaged only where AML law, security, or fraud prevention requires it, which keeps routine play frictionless.
Risk-Based Customer Assessment
The depth of AML and KYC controls is matched to the actual threat posed by a given profile, instead of treating all participants alike. Low-risk activity passes through the platform with minimal restrictions, while warning signs require attention.
Factors that shape the rating:
- Transaction volume
- A change of IP address or location and atypical login patterns
- The age and history of the profile
- Consistency of the wallets used for deposits and withdrawals
- Prior security signals
The resulting score determines the next steps. A low value leaves the player without any document request, while a higher one may prompt withdrawal confirmation via 2FA, temporary profile restrictions, or a requirement for KYC documents. Because every transaction is recorded on the blockchain, any score rests on a verifiable record.
Ongoing Transaction Analysis
Profile activity is examined dynamically, rather than by an isolated deposit or withdrawal — this is handled by an ongoing AML function. Where monitoring records individual movements of funds and risk scoring assigns a profile a value, this layer tracks how patterns build up across a long sequence of transactions.
What is tracked over time:
- The frequency and regularity of fund movements
- The wallets and addresses involved
- Comparison of recent transactions against the past by timestamps
- A run of withdrawals at the edge of a threshold
- Sharp changes in volume
The analysis rests on the permanent record produced by blockchain settlement: each movement of funds is secured by network confirmations and carries a timestamp suitable for comparison against the past. A wallet that suddenly forwards funds to unfamiliar addresses stands out noticeably against its own history.
Sanctions and PEP Screening
Cybet checks players against lists of restricted persons and, in parallel, identifies politically exposed figures whose profiles require enhanced review. Sanctions screening matches a person against lists of individuals, organizations, and jurisdictions cut off from financial services, while PEP screening identifies holders of prominent public positions — current and former — who are associated with a heightened risk of illicit fund flows. Both checks are underpinned by the Anjouan license and the obligations that stem from it.
Components of the screening:
- Matching against lists of restricted individuals, organizations, and jurisdictions
- Identifying PEPs together with their associates and family members
- Cutting off access from restricted jurisdictions: mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore
- Routing PEP profiles onto a path of close review
- Checking at the KYC stage that a person is free of restrictions
Falling into the PEP category does not terminate access immediately, but merely raises the bar for review: large withdrawals go through manual review, and before releasing funds the platform is entitled to request identity documents. The screening is triggered the moment identification begins and works in tandem with KYC, keeping the platform within international AML standards and out of reach of sanctioned persons and territories.
FAQ
In most cases, no. An email address is enough to register, and most participants play without uploading documents. Identification is engaged only on certain triggers — atypical login, suspicion of fraud, withdrawals above the thresholds, or a legal requirement.
Every deposit and withdrawal passes through the blockchain with network confirmations, which makes the movement of funds transparent and immutable. Additional layers include withdrawal confirmation by email or via 2FA, real-time reading of activity, and manual review of large or high-risk transactions
A request arises with atypical login activity (a series of failed attempts, an unfamiliar device), suspicion of fraud, withdrawals above the established thresholds, or for age confirmation. In a dispute over profile ownership or in the event of a block, the hash of the most recent deposit is required as proof of control over the wallet.
These are the matching of participants against lists of restricted persons, organizations, and jurisdictions, and the identification of those who hold a prominent public position. Access is closed to residents of mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, and Singapore. Such status does not block a profile immediately, but it raises the bar for review, with manual handling of large withdrawals.
The limit on a single withdrawal is USD 100,000. Large or high-risk withdrawals are sent for manual review, where the legitimacy of the transaction is confirmed before funds are released. The platform operates under a license from the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority (ALSI-202409034-FI2).